Non-Invasive Stool- and Blood-Based Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Emerging Alternatives

Authors

  • Ugwu IV Author
  • Gbaa Z Author
  • Umobong EO Author
  • Omolabake BI Author
  • Tsegha LJ Author
  • Ojo BA Author
  • Otene SA Author
  • Gbaa FA Author

Keywords:

Biomarkers, Blood-based biomarkers, Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), Colorectal cancer, Early detection, Fecal immunochemical test (FIT), Stool DNA, Methylated SEPT9, Minimal residual disease (MRD), Noninvasive screening

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for screening, but its invasiveness, cost, and limited acceptance highlight the need for non-invasive alternatives. Stool- and blood-based biomarkers have emerged as promising tools for early detection, surveillance, and minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring. This review evaluates the current evidence on stool- and blood-based biomarkers for CRC, focusing on their diagnostic performance, clinical utility, challenges, and future prospects in comparison with colonoscopy. A comprehensive review of recent literature (2010–2025) was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Studies evaluating fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), methylated SEPT9, protein biomarkers, and microRNAs were included, with emphasis on sensitivity, specificity, and clinical applications. FIT and mt-sDNA demonstrate sensitivities of 70–92% and specificities of 87–90% for CRC detection, though their effectiveness in identifying advanced adenomas is lower. Blood-based assays, particularly methylated SEPT9 and ctDNA, show moderate sensitivity (60–75%) but provide unique value in MRD detection and recurrence monitoring. Combination strategies integrating stool and blood biomarkers improve diagnostic yield. However, limitations include variability across populations, high cost, limited access in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and lack of assay standardization. Stool- and blood-based biomarkers are important complements to colonoscopy, enhancing CRC detection and surveillance while improving patient compliance. FIT remains the most cost-effective for large-scale screening, while ctDNA coupled with standardization and global accessibility efforts, could transform CRC prevention and management. Wider implementation of biomarkers in risk-stratified screening, investment in cost-effective approaches for LMICs, assay standardization, and adoption of multi-omics innovations are essential for equitable global CRC care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ugwu IV
    Department of Anatomic Pathology, Federal University of Health Sciences, Otukpo, Nigeria
  • Gbaa Z
    Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria.
  • Umobong EO
    Histoconsult Laboratory, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • Omolabake BI
    Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria.
  • Tsegha LJ
    Department of Surgery, College of Health Sciences, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria.
  • Ojo BA
    Department of Anatomical Pathology, Benue State University Teaching Hospital Makurdi, Nigeria
  • Otene SA
    Department of Radiology, Federal University of Health Sciences, Otukpo (FUHSO), Benue State, Nigeria.
  • Gbaa FA
    College of Health Sciences, Benue State University, Makurdi, Nigeria.

Published

2025-12-27

How to Cite

Non-Invasive Stool- and Blood-Based Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Emerging Alternatives. (2025). Western Journal of Medical and Biomedical Sciences, 6(4), 405-413. https://wjmbs.org/index.php/home/article/view/128

Most read articles by the same author(s)